Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am hearing that News 8 will air an anti OHV story about OWSVRA tonight at 11. True?

If so, watch and let them know how you feel!

WHAT would the CA park system (and the general fund) do without green sticker $???

Zancat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just saw the trailer. Want to bet they won't even mention AB right next door?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Crazy. Afterall, off-roaders are the primary patrons of "the park."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I think the guy has a point. He clearly said, "This park belongs to you."

And it does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watched it from the news 8 website. Typical enviro-nazi that doesn't understand how anyone can have fun riding a motorized vehicle in the desert. At least they allowed a response from the SDORC prez. I wonder how much of that interview was edited out?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watched it from the news 8 website. Typical enviro-nazi that doesn't understand how anyone can have fun riding a motorized vehicle in the desert. At least they allowed a response from the SDORC prez. I wonder how much of that interview was edited out?

On the SDORC Facebook site he says that is what they used form a 15 min interview....

And they say they want diversity...

Zancat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I think the guy has a point. He clearly said, "This park belongs to you."

And it does.

It's an OHV park... paid for with OHV funds, right? ( I may be wrong)

If so, the park is paid for, used by, and belonging to OHV users... If you don't have an OHV, I'm sure you can still visit, and have a great time, but it's kind of like me visiting Dog Park without a dog, or even liking dogs... kind of defeats the purpose.

ABDSP is one of the largest parks in the US, and a very small section of it is set aside for OHV use... anti OHV bias indeed

Thank goodness for dual sport bikes, so that we can enjoy ourselves in the OHV section, or visit the rest of the park with some more stringent rules to follow...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting- it's a suit filed under a whistleblower statute.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding of whistleblower statutes are they are financially incentivized. So this guy stands to make big bucks if he can prove that his issue-raising went unheeded.

He's not trying to make the earth a better place- just to show that damage has occurred (duh) and they ignored his pleas to make changes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i wonder if he realizes where his pay check comes from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting- it's a suit filed under a whistleblower statute.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding of whistleblower statutes are they are financially incentivized. So this guy stands to make big bucks if he can prove that his issue-raising went unheeded.

He's not trying to make the earth a better place- just to show that damage has occurred (duh) and they ignored his pleas to make changes.

Maybe for the protection offered to the whistleblower? I dunno. I thought the main whistleblower goal was for compliance?

Unfortunately there is damage being done. We do damage to the environment. But it’s designated for such damage. Some people don’t get it. Many visitors do get it. It’s a never ending battle. But in a large society with so many people you have to let everyone speak their mind.

I’m glad no damage was done putting in that windmill farm for a more environment friendly creation of energy. LOL

Unlike forest and grasslands, OcWells impact form ORV’s has got to be one of the lowest from the entire off road use nationwide. An active volcano does more damage to the atmosphere in one day than we do all year. We’re not eroding the soil out there. Water ways aren’t being polluted. Sure we transfer some fungus/species of plants on a small percentage. Prolly too small to be recorded.

Users leave nails, oil changes and lots of trash. Which we need to educate people on.

But as for the designated trails…..one good wind storm and or a flash flood in the washes and you’ll never even know we were there.

State has its duty to protect the land for future use. So it’ll be interesting to see the angle presented.

Gotta give kudos to SDAR members for being so responsible and active in keeping with the rules. A great example of how an organization/club can enjoy the parks responsibly.

I think the Rangers in charge of keeping the park safe and usable do a great job. We’ve lost a lot of trails there in the last 30 years. Trail blazing is one of the best ways to connect to the sites out there. I don’t see how making more designated trails would help the desert. But there is plenty of open land now for use.

Glamis and other parks have had the same issues and are still open. With the recreational riders becoming one of the fastest growing groups to use such lands, we’re bound to see more of this in the future.

But with a bike being so nimble and able to access more unusable ground and cover so much of it than any other vehicle, it’s hard to go unnoticed these days.

This too shall pass……I hope…I really enjoy that peace of earth out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting- it's a suit filed under a whistleblower statute.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding of whistleblower statutes are they are financially incentivized. So this guy stands to make big bucks if he can prove that his issue-raising went unheeded.

He's not trying to make the earth a better place- just to show that damage has occurred (duh) and they ignored his pleas to make changes.

Maybe for the protection offered to the whistleblower? I dunno. I thought the main whistleblower goal was for compliance?

Ah- The whistleblower statutes give a financial award to those who blow the whistle- it's a percentage of the judgement as well as protection from any sort of retribution. This can be BIG BIG money. They were written to give employees of government vendors a way to report the companies for whom they work to the government about malfeasance. Not a bad law, but certainly promotes goldigging.

I don't have details about this case, but whistleblower was mentioned in the news report, and it is likely whoever is representing him pitched media for coverage. Once it's in the media, the pressure to settle is fierce- without trial- and the whistleblower gets a piece of that action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those numerous trails and tracks are not damage but improvement, in my eyes. The housing development the plaintiff lives in, caused more "damage" to the environment then 10 Ocotillo Wells combined. Heck, storms cause damage to the environment. Big time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anybody thought about suing these individual planitiffs/eco Nazis? I'm sure a creative attorney could tie them up in court for extended and costly periods of time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep Ocotillo Wells beautiful, burn a Prius! Before its hippie owners can get to the park to whine like a little bitch.

Eeh, hope that didn't go overboard, but I just can't stand the types that want to shut everything down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information